🖨️ Print / Download PDF

Murugesan Vs The District Revenue Officer, The District Revenue Officer and The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Case No: Writ Petition No. 12269 of 2010

Date of Decision: Oct. 5, 2010

Hon'ble Judges: M. Jaichandren, J

Bench: Single Bench

Advocate: T. Muruganantham, for the Appellant; K.M. Vijayakumar, Special Government Pleader, for the Respondent

Translate: English | हिन्दी | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | ಕನ್ನಡ | मराठी

Judgement

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

M. Jaichandren, J.@mdashHeard Mr. T.Muruganantham, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as

Mr.K.M.Vijayakumar, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents.

2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if

the representation of the Petitioner, dated 15.08.2010, is directed to be disposed of, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified

period.

3. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the Respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this

Court.

4. In view of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this petition and in view of the submissions made by the learned Counsel

appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, the first and the second Respondents are directed to consider and dispose of the Petitioner''s representation,

dated 15.08.2010, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The

Petitioner is directed to submit a copy of the representation, dated 15.08.2010, along with a copy of this order, to the first and the second

Respondents. However, it is made clear, that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

5. The writ petition stands disposed of, with the above directions. No costs.