Srinivasan Co. Vs Commissioner of Income Tax

Madras High Court 2 Dec 2002 Tax Case (Reference) No. 297 of 1999 2 December 2002 (2003) 130 TAXMAN 489
Bench: Full Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Tax Case (Reference) No. 297 of 1999 2 December 2002

Hon'ble Bench

N.V. Balasubramanian, J; K. Raviraja Pandian, J

Advocates

R. Janakiraman, for the Assessee Mrs. Pushya Sitharaman, for the Revenue, for the Appellant;

Judgement Text

Translate:

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.

In pursuance of the directions of this court, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has stated the case and referred the following questions of law :

1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in computing the income with reference to the application of

section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1984-85 while there was an amendment introduced by the Taxation Laws

(Amendment) Act, 1984 with effect from 1-4-1985?

2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the reopening of the assessment u/s 147 is valid

in law?

2. The assessment year involved is 1984-85.

3. Mrs. Pushya Sitharaman, learned senior standing counsel for the revenue fairly submits that the issues raised in both the questions are covered

against the revenue by the decision of the Supreme Court in Brij Mohan Das Laxman Das Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Allahabad, .

Following the said decision of the Supreme Court, both the questions of law referred to us are answered in favour of the assessee and against the

revenue. In the circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs.

From The Blog
Supreme Court: Hindu Succession Act Excludes Tribal Daughters
Oct
22
2025

Story

Supreme Court: Hindu Succession Act Excludes Tribal Daughters
Read More
Supreme Court Alarmed at 8.82 Lakh Pending Execution Cases
Oct
22
2025

Story

Supreme Court Alarmed at 8.82 Lakh Pending Execution Cases
Read More