@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER
I.P. Singh, J.@mdashHeard
2. This application has been filed for quashing only the observation passed by order dated 9.1.2003 by the learned District and Sessions Judge in
A.B.P. No. 2069 of 2002 arising out of the Sigon Rs. Case No. 12 of 2001 under Sections 147, 148, 436/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Perused the order impugned. It appears that the learned Magistrate after perusal of the case diary has taken cognizance of offence under
Sections 147, 148 and 436/34 of the Indian Penal Code, whereas while disposing an anticipatory bail application, the learned Sessions Judge has
observed that no case was found against the Petitioner to attract the offence u/s 436 of the Indian Penal Code since the thatched verandah does
not form a dwelling house and thus no case u/s 436 is made out. According to provision of Section 436 of the Indian Penal Code a building which
was set to fire was used as a place of worship or as a human living or as a place for custody of property then only offence u/s 436 of the Indian
Penal Code is made out. If the fire is set to part of the building like Dalan attached to dwelling house it would attract offence punishable u/s 436.
As such the observations made by the court below was not proper at this stage. Moreso, if a thatched verandah is used as Dalan, it will be
considered a part of the dwelling house and setting fire to a portion of the same would certainly attract the offence punishable u/s 436 of the Indian
Penal Code. As such the observation made by the learned court below was uncalled for at that stage and is fit to be quashed.
4. Accordingly the observation made by learned Court below dated 9.1.2003 about dwelling house is hereby quashed and the application is
allowed. The learned Magistrate is directed to proceed in accordance with law.
