🖨️ Print / Download PDF

Asha Kumari Vs The Branch Manager, State Bank of India and Others

Case No: LPA No. 144 of 2008

Date of Decision: July 1, 2008

Citation: (2009) 1 PLJR 402

Hon'ble Judges: R.M. Lodha, C.J; Kishore K. Mandal, J

Bench: Division Bench

Advocate: K. Vishoka Nand, for the Appellant; Satya Prakash Tripathi and Mukund Mohan Jha, for the Respondent

Final Decision: Dismissed

Translate: English | हिन्दी | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | ಕನ್ನಡ | मराठी

Judgement

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

1. Even if we accept the case of the appellant that the application for appointment on compassionate ground was made within one year of the

death of her father, the details of the property, which are available at page 19 of the writ petition, shows that the appellant was not in financial

constraints due to death of her father. Particulars of assets are thus:--

Particular of Assets:--

a. Terminal Benefits:

P.F Rs.

4,91,882.00

Gratuity Rs.

2,26,681.00

Leave encash Rs.

1,30,821.00

Total Rs.

8,49,384.00

b. Family Pension: Basic Rs. 3590.00

D.A. Rs. 3022.00

Total Rs. 6612.00

c. Moveable Prop.:

d. Immovable Prop.:-Agricultural

land:- 1.5 Acre.

e. House-hold goods: T.V.,

Almirah.

We are satisfied that on merits, the appellant has no case for appointment on compassionate ground. Dismissal of the writ petition by the Single

Judge, therefore, cannot be faulted. Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed in limine.