Baijnath Das Vs The State of Bihar and Others

Patna High Court 18 Jan 2002 L.P.A. No. 92 of 2002 (2002) 1 PLJR 657
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

L.P.A. No. 92 of 2002

Hon'ble Bench

Ravi S. Dhavan, C.J; Shashank Kr. Singh, J

Final Decision

Dismissed

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

1. The letters patent appeal has been filed on the order dated 11 December 2001 in CWJC. No. 15865 of 2001 Baijnath Das v. The State of

Bihar and Ors.

2. The Appellant-Petitioner did not receive employment on companionate ground on the principle of rule of harness. The Appellant-Petitioner''s

father had died in 1984. Seventeen years later the Appellant-Petitioner desires that he should be given an employment regard being had to the fact

that this father was in government service.

3. Counsel for the Appellant Petitioner acknowledges that when the Appellant-Petitioner''s father died he was six years of age. This matter of

compassionate appointments must not be reduced to a ridiculous proposition that a job must wait for the ward of a government servant, like in the

present case, for 17 years. The very principle of the appointments on compassionate ground will than be destroyed. The cardinal principle is to

give succour to the affected family of a government servant. There is not a circumstance of immediate succour in this case.

4. Dismissed.

From The Blog
SC: Brother Can Sell Father’s House Even Without Share
Oct
31
2025

Story

SC: Brother Can Sell Father’s House Even Without Share
Read More
SC to Decide If Women Can Face POCSO Penetrative Assault
Oct
31
2025

Story

SC to Decide If Women Can Face POCSO Penetrative Assault
Read More