Shobha Nand Jha and Others Vs The State of Bihar and Others

Patna High Court 21 Nov 2007 CWJC No. 14542 of 2003; 379 of 2004 with MJC No. 1808 of 2002 (2007) 11 PAT CK 0112
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

CWJC No. 14542 of 2003; 379 of 2004 with MJC No. 1808 of 2002

Hon'ble Bench

Shiva Kirti Singh, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

Shiva Kirti Singh, J.@mdashHeard the parties. For the present this Court is primarily concerned with the contempt matter pending vide MJC No. 1808/2002. Earlier this Court noticed all the relevant facts and found substance in the stand of the petitioners that the S.D.O., Madhubani could not have proceeded to declare some of the lands in respect of some branches of the family to be surplus when a stay order in respect of the lands of the larger family had been passed in the pending Writ Petition bearing CWJC No. 3575/1997. From the records of the aforesaid Writ Petition of 1997 it appears that interim order was passed on 3.6.1997 and it continued to be operative even after the Writ Petition was admitted for hearing on 23.7.1997.

2. The S.D.O., Madhubani had appeared before this Court and realizing the mistake in proceeding with part of the lands during the pendency of the Writ Petition and during the operation of interim order, it was submitted before this Court that all the offending orders passed by him in ignorance/disregard of the interim order of stay of this Court shall be withdrawn or nullified by him. It appears from Annexure-A to the supplementary show cause of O.P. No. 3, S.D.O. that now he has passed orders to withdraw all his orders passed in teeth of interim order of stay in the pending CWJC No. 3575 of 1997. It appears that for denotifying various notifications already issued pursuant to such recalled orders, the records have been sent to the District Collector, Madhubani. It is expected that the District Collector, Madhubani shall act in accordance with law and authorize issuance of notification so that earlier notifications may stand denotified. This should be done expeditiously and preferably within three months from today,

3. It is made clear that this order or the earlier orders passed in contempt matter shall not prejudice the case of either of the parties when the Writ Petition CWJC No. 3575/1997 is taken up and decided on merits.

4. It will be open to the petitioners to move this Court again, if the concerned notifications are not denotified within a reasonable period.

5. So far as the related Writ Petitions are concerned, in view of the fact that impugned orders have already been withdrawn by the S.D.O., Madhubani on account of contempt petition, the Writ Petitions have become infructuous and learned counsel for the petitioners, therefore does not press these Writ Petitions. Hence, all these three matters stand finally disposed of.

6. It goes without saying that if the private respondents are aggrieved by the interim order passed in CWJC No. 3575/ 1997, they would be at liberty to seek relief in accordance with law. Let a copy of this order be given to learned SC-2.

From The Blog
Aishwarya Rai Bachchan Wins ₹4 Crore Tax Case at ITAT Mumbai
Nov
07
2025

Court News

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan Wins ₹4 Crore Tax Case at ITAT Mumbai
Read More
Supreme Court to Decide If Section 12AA Registration Alone Grants Trusts 80G Tax Benefits for Donors
Nov
07
2025

Court News

Supreme Court to Decide If Section 12AA Registration Alone Grants Trusts 80G Tax Benefits for Donors
Read More