Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Bhor Industries Ltd.

Bombay High Court 26 Feb 2003 IT Appeal No. 644 of 2002 (2003) 02 BOM CK 0102
Bench: Division Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

IT Appeal No. 644 of 2002

Hon'ble Bench

S.H. Kapadia, J; J.P. Devadhar, J

Advocates

R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetly and S.V. Bharucha, instructed by K.B. Rao, for the Appellant; J.D. Mistry and B.D. Damodar, instructed by Kanga and Co., for the Respondent

Acts Referred
  • Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 10(3), 45(1), 56

Judgement Text

Translate:

S.H. Kapadia, J.@mdashThe following question of law has been referred to us by way of Department''s appeal for asst. yr. 1994-95 :

"Whether, on the fact and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon''ble Tribunal erred in allowing the appeal of the assessee by excluding the sum of Rs. 20 crores received by the assessee being the compensation for the relinquishment of its tenancy right for the Cadell Road factory premises."

2. In view of the judgment of this Court in the case of Cadell Weaving Mill Co. P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, , the question is answered in the negative i.e., in favour of the assessee and against the Department.

3. Appeal is accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Quashes Bihar’s Mutation Rule: Property Sale Registration Cannot Be Blocked by Extra Conditions
Nov
11
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Quashes Bihar’s Mutation Rule: Property Sale Registration Cannot Be Blocked by Extra Conditions
Read More
How Indians Can Start a Company in the USA: Step-by-Step Guide, Costs, and Legal Requirements
Nov
11
2025

Court News

How Indians Can Start a Company in the USA: Step-by-Step Guide, Costs, and Legal Requirements
Read More