Gour Chand Audhikari Vs Komal Chandra Pal

Calcutta High Court 8 Jan 1897 (1897) 01 CAL CK 0001
Bench: Division Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Gordon, J; Ghose, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

Ghose and Gordon, JJ.@mdashWe think that this rule must be made absolute. In doing so, we need only refer to the case of Nilratan Sen v. Jogesh Chundra Bhuttacharjee ILR 23 Cal. 983 in which a view, contrary to that which has been taken by the Magistrate, was adopted by this Court. The order reviving the complaint and the subsequent proceedings will be set aside, and the fine imposed upon the petitioner, if realized, will be refunded.

From The Blog
CBDT Cracks Down on Bogus Deduction Claims: Taxpayers to Get SMS and Email Alerts
Dec
16
2025

Court News

CBDT Cracks Down on Bogus Deduction Claims: Taxpayers to Get SMS and Email Alerts
Read More
Gujarat High Court: Myopic Reading of Sections 129 & 130 of CGST Act Would Create Hostility
Dec
16
2025

Court News

Gujarat High Court: Myopic Reading of Sections 129 & 130 of CGST Act Would Create Hostility
Read More