Norman, J.@mdashAs we understand this case, the prisoner Gour Mohan Sen, Mooktear, applied u/s 50, clause 2 of Act X of 1862, to the
Collector for a new stamp in lieu of one supposed to have been spoilt within six months previously. It turned out, on enquiry, that the writing on the
stamp had been tampered with for fraudulent purposes, and the prisoners were committed for using a forged document, u/s 471. The Collector, to
whom the stamp was tendered, was not sitting as a Court, Civil or Criminal, nor was the document given in evidence in any proceeding in any
Court. Section 170 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has no application to the case, and our interference is quite unnecessary, But if section 170
had applied, the Judge would have done well to see if the Collector would not give the necessary sanction before he commenced the trial of the
case, instead of sending up the proceedings to us u/s 434. The prisoners must be tried.
