The Queen Vs Gour Mohan Sen and Another

Calcutta High Court 5 May 1869 (1869) 05 CAL CK 0003

Judgement Snapshot

Judgement Text

Translate:

Norman, J.@mdashAs we understand this case, the prisoner Gour Mohan Sen, Mooktear, applied u/s 50, clause 2 of Act X of 1862, to the Collector for a new stamp in lieu of one supposed to have been spoilt within six months previously. It turned out, on enquiry, that the writing on the stamp had been tampered with for fraudulent purposes, and the prisoners were committed for using a forged document, u/s 471. The Collector, to whom the stamp was tendered, was not sitting as a Court, Civil or Criminal, nor was the document given in evidence in any proceeding in any Court. Section 170 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has no application to the case, and our interference is quite unnecessary, But if section 170 had applied, the Judge would have done well to see if the Collector would not give the necessary sanction before he commenced the trial of the case, instead of sending up the proceedings to us u/s 434. The prisoners must be tried.

From The Blog
Foreign Shares Not Reported in Schedule FA: Legal Consequences, Scenarios, and What Taxpayers Must Do
Jan
08
2026

Court News

Foreign Shares Not Reported in Schedule FA: Legal Consequences, Scenarios, and What Taxpayers Must Do
Read More
CCI Cracks Down on Collusive Bidding in Defence Tender: Why Fair Competition Protects Price Discovery
Jan
08
2026

Court News

CCI Cracks Down on Collusive Bidding in Defence Tender: Why Fair Competition Protects Price Discovery
Read More