Dukhimoni Dasi Vs Tulsi Charan

Calcutta High Court 24 Nov 1911 13 Ind. Cas. 512
Bench: Division Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Lawrence Jenkins, C.J; N. Chatterjea, J

Acts Referred

Evidence Act, 1872 — Section 116

Judgement Text

Translate:

Lawrence Jenkins, C.J.@mdashHaving regard to Section 116 of the Evidence Act the defendant cannot be permitted to deny that the plaintiff had

a title to the possession of the land at a time when the license was given to enter into possession. In the circumstances a suit for use and occupation

would lie. There is no question as to the amount due on that basis; it is Rs. 40 and there will be a decree for that amount with costs. The plaintiff

will have the costs of the Rule which is made absolute. We assess the hearing fee at one gold mohur.

From The Blog
Bandhua Mukti Morcha vs Union of India (1983)
Oct
17
2025

Landmark Judgements

Bandhua Mukti Morcha vs Union of India (1983)
Read More
A.R. Antulay vs R.S. Nayak and Another (1988)
Oct
17
2025

Landmark Judgements

A.R. Antulay vs R.S. Nayak and Another (1988)
Read More