Reba Paul Vs Radha Krishan Poddar

Calcutta High Court 19 Apr 1993 Matter of 1993 (1993) 2 ILR (Cal) 201
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Matter of 1993

Hon'ble Bench

Ajoy Nath Ray, J

Advocates

J.K. Dasgupta, for Reba Paul, Barin Ghosh and Joy Saha, for financier, for the Appellant;

Judgement Text

Translate:

Ajoy Nath Ray, J.@mdashThe parties are agreed that they would submit their differences to an Arbitrator to be appointed by Court.

Supplementary affidavits have been filed to that effect. The dispute between the parties is mainly concerned with the ownership of the vehicle being

a diesel taxi bearing registration No. WMT-1384 and what moneys, if any, are payable by Sm. Reba Paul in respect of the said vehicle to the

financier.

2. During the pendency of the reference, ordered below, the Petitioner shall continue to pay without prejudice every month an ad hoc sum of Rs.

1,500 to the financier, such payments to be adjusted in the award to be made herein, and a further sum of Rs. 1,500 is to be kept deposited with

her own Advocate-on-Record who will act as Receiver without security and without remuneration for holding the said sums without lien or

encumbrance until further orders of Court.

3. Mr. Gour Roychowdhury, Barrister, is appointed Arbitrator with summary powers for the purpose of disposing of the disputes that have arisen

between the parties and shall make his award stating clearly, amongst other things, as to who is to get possession of the said taxi and upon what

terms, if any. The Arbitrator shall also make a money award, in whatsoever''s favour might it go, making adjustments therein about the interim ad

hoc payments.

4. It is necessary to explain what is meant by vesting an Arbitrator with summary powers. A suit is usually disposed of by examination of witnesses

from the bow, and formal disclosure, inspection and proof of documents. Sometimes, however, a Court disposes of a suit in a summary manner

upon affidavits. No formal evidence is required to be tendered during such summary procedure. It is well-known that Arbitrators have such

summary powers to dispose of matters without going through the formal procedure of calling witnesses or having documents proved before them in

accordance with the Evidence Act. Such summary power is mentioned as being given to an Arbitrator appointed in an order of Court only out of

abundant caution. If parties were to appoint an Arbitrator, such an Arbitrator would automatically have such summary powers and no party could

unilaterally rob an Arbitrator of such inherent summary powers possessed by him.

5. The deposits of Rs. 1,500 per month along with interest accrued thereon shall be kept by the learned Receiver reinvested in a proper interest

bearing account to be opened by the learned Receiver until disposal of the Reference.

6. The vehicle shall forthwith be unconditionally released to Sm. Reba Paul who undertakes to keep the vehicle in a roadworthy condition and also

keep the same properly insured until conclusion of the reference. She shall be entitled to ply the vehicle and use the same in the manner she pleases

without disposing of the same provided the monthly instalments are paid and deposited regularly.. In default, the financier shall be at liberty to apply

for appointment of a Receiver and taking possession of the vehicle.

7. The learned Arbitrator shall fix his fees per sitting and the same shall be borne equally by the Petitioner and the financier.

8. The learned Arbitrator will make and publish his Award within four months from entering upon the Reference.

9. Shri Swapan Sarkar, the learned Advocate who was appointed Receiver, shall be discharged after the vehicle is handed over to Sm. Reba Paul.

10. The learned Arbitrator would also be free to adopt any formal procedure or to take any particular evidence at his own discretion. He shall also

be free to give reasons if he so thinks fit, in the Award, but shall not be so compelled.

11. All parties, the learned Arbitrator, both the learned Receivers, the Motor Vehicle Department, the concerned Police Station in whose custody

the vehicle is now lying, and others concerned are to act on a signed copy of this dictated order on the usual undertakings.

From The Blog
Supreme Court to Rule on Multi-State Societies in IBC Cases
Oct
25
2025

Story

Supreme Court to Rule on Multi-State Societies in IBC Cases
Read More
Supreme Court: Minors Can Void Property Sales by Guardians
Oct
25
2025

Story

Supreme Court: Minors Can Void Property Sales by Guardians
Read More