Mozaffur Ally Vs Girish Chandra Das

Calcutta High Court 24 Jun 1868 Special Appeal No. 2848 of 1867 (1868) 06 CAL CK 0004

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Special Appeal No. 2848 of 1867

Judgement Text

Translate:

Loch, J.@mdashThe objection must, we think, be allowed. The rulings of this Court, to which the Judge alludes, go no further than this: that where a plaintiff is barred on the face of his own plaint, an Appellate Court is justified in raising the issue, although it has never been raised below. This refers to cases where a plaintiff sues for arrears of rent for 6 years, or for wassilat for 12, and such like, where the very recital of the plaint shows a considerable portion of the relief sought, to be impossible under the limitation laws. Now, in this case, the plaintiff asked for two kinds of relief. He wished to have the survey award altered, and also to be restored to possession of his land, the two wrongs not having been done at one and the same time, but at a considerable interval. Thus the survey award was made on the 23rd of September 1863 whilst the plaintiff dates his dispossession from the 14th of January 1864.

2. If the plaintiff had come into Court merely to ask for the concealment of the survey award, he would have been obliged to bring his suit within three years of that award; but his claim to be restored to possession of land from which he had been subsequently dispossessed, would be an entirely different cause of action, and one that would be governed not by Clause 6, Section 4, Act XIV of 1859, but by Clause 12, Section 11 of that Act. He would have, that is to say, twelve years to bring his suit.

3. This, we remark, was the view the defendant took of the plaint, for he raised the issue of twelve years'' limitation, which the Principal Sudder Ameen tried. The Judge''s order must be reversed with costs (of this appeal) on the special respondent, and the case be remanded for trial on its merits, and the costs will follow the result.


1Limitation of 12 years (sic)uits for immoveable property.

[Cl. 12, Sec. 1:--To suits for the recovery of immoveable property or of any interest in immoveable property to which no other provision of this Act applies the period of twelve years from the time the cause of action arose.]

From The Blog
Aishwarya Rai Bachchan Wins ₹4 Crore Tax Case at ITAT Mumbai
Nov
07
2025

Court News

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan Wins ₹4 Crore Tax Case at ITAT Mumbai
Read More
Supreme Court to Decide If Section 12AA Registration Alone Grants Trusts 80G Tax Benefits for Donors
Nov
07
2025

Court News

Supreme Court to Decide If Section 12AA Registration Alone Grants Trusts 80G Tax Benefits for Donors
Read More