The Empress Vs Baidanath Das

Calcutta High Court 18 Feb 1878 (1878) 02 CAL CK 0006
Bench: Full Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Richard Garth, C.J; Markby, J; L.S. Jackson, J; Kemp, J; Ainslie, J

Acts Referred
  • Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (CrPC) - Section 222

Judgement Text

Translate:

Richard Garth, C.J.@mdashWe are clearly of opinion, that an offence u/s 49, Act XXI of 1856, can be tried summarily by a Magistrate u/s 222 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

2. The confiscation, which is provided for by Section 49, is merely a consequence of the conviction, and does not form part of the punishment for the offence. We observe that, in the case of Khetter Mohun Chowrunghee 22 W.R. Cr. Rul. 43, to which we are referred, the question which we are called upon to decide was given up by the Government Pleader without argument; and that in the second case the learned Judges merely followed the ruling in the first, so that this would appear to be the first occasion on which the point has been seriously considered.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More