Iswar Chandra Koer Vs Umesh Chandra Pal

Calcutta High Court 30 Sep 1871 (1871) 09 CAL CK 0002

Judgement Snapshot

Judgement Text

Translate:

Kemp, Offg. C.J.

1. I have on three occasions, in Queen v. Mohim Chandra Chuckerbutty 3 B.L.R., A. Cr., 67, Dulali Bewa v. Bhuban Shaha 3 B.L.R., A. Cr., 53 and The Queen v. Girish Chandra Ghose 7 B.L.R., 513, sitting with Justices Glover and Markby, ruled that a Magistrate is not competent to make over a case to a Subordinate Deputy Magistrate who has not been empowered to entertain cases either on complaint or on the report of the Police, without first recording the prosecutor''s statement. I would quash the conviction as illegal. The accused must be released.

Ainslie, J.

It seems to me that, u/s 66B of the Criminal Procedure Code, a Magistrate who is competent to direct that all complaints or reports of Police officers may be dealt with by a Subordinate Magistrate, is also competent to direct any particular complaint or report to be so dealt with. I would therefore not interfere.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More