Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashThe question decided by the Division Bench, in respect of which this appeal has been brought, arose in a special appeal from the decision of the Principal Sudder Ameen. We agree with Mr. Justice Loch in thinking that execution was barred by limitation. Nothing was done upon the petitions of the 4th May 1861 and 14th August 1862, and they were consequently struck off for default. They did not, therefore, keep the execution alive. The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Raja Satyasaran Ghosal Bahadur Vs Bhairab Chandra Brahmo
Judgement Snapshot
Case Number
Appeal No. 7 of 1868
Judgement Text
Translate:
