Purna Chandra Roy and Others Vs Abhaya Chandra Roy and Another

Calcutta High Court 2 Feb 1870 Miscellaneous Special Appeal No. 449 of 1869 (1870) 02 CAL CK 0017

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Miscellaneous Special Appeal No. 449 of 1869

Judgement Text

Translate:

L.S. Jackson, J.@mdashThe contention in this case is, that the Judge of the lower appellate Court ought not to have allowed the decree-holder to carry on execution, if he had found that the assignment of the decree was a benami transaction, and there is no other circumstance alleged. The mere fact of a decree being assigned to A, for his benefit, although by agreement the name of B was used, will not prevent execution being taken out in the name of the ostensible decree-holder. I think the appeal must be dismissed with costs.

From The Blog
Quick Checklist: Start a Company in the USA from India
Nov
09
2025

Court News

Quick Checklist: Start a Company in the USA from India
Read More
Supreme Court: Release Deed Ends Coparcener Rights in Joint Family Property; Unregistered Settlements Valid to Show Severance
Nov
09
2025

Court News

Supreme Court: Release Deed Ends Coparcener Rights in Joint Family Property; Unregistered Settlements Valid to Show Severance
Read More