Purna Chandra Roy and Others Vs Abhaya Chandra Roy and Another

Calcutta High Court 2 Feb 1870 Miscellaneous Special Appeal No. 449 of 1869 (1870) 02 CAL CK 0017

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Miscellaneous Special Appeal No. 449 of 1869

Judgement Text

Translate:

L.S. Jackson, J.@mdashThe contention in this case is, that the Judge of the lower appellate Court ought not to have allowed the decree-holder to carry on execution, if he had found that the assignment of the decree was a benami transaction, and there is no other circumstance alleged. The mere fact of a decree being assigned to A, for his benefit, although by agreement the name of B was used, will not prevent execution being taken out in the name of the ostensible decree-holder. I think the appeal must be dismissed with costs.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More