Hurronath Roy and Others Vs Maheroollah Mollah

Calcutta High Court 8 Jan 1867 (1867) 01 CAL CK 0001

Judgement Snapshot

Judgement Text

Translate:

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J., Kemp, L.S. Jackson and Markby, JJ.@mdashWe are of opinion that the view taken by the Judge of the Small Cause Court is the correct one. The suit is brought upon the bond itself, and not upon any fresh agreement alleged to have been come to between the parties. Under these circumstances, we are of opinion that limitation did run from the time when default was made in the payment of the first installment, in consequence of which the whole amount became due. It is unnecessary for us to express any opinion as to the correctness of the decision to which reference has been made by the Judge of the Small Cause Court.

Norman, J.

I entirely agree. I had occasion to consider this question in the case of Breen v. Balfour Bourke''s Rep., 120.

From The Blog
Quick Checklist: Start a Company in the USA from India
Nov
09
2025

Court News

Quick Checklist: Start a Company in the USA from India
Read More
Supreme Court: Release Deed Ends Coparcener Rights in Joint Family Property; Unregistered Settlements Valid to Show Severance
Nov
09
2025

Court News

Supreme Court: Release Deed Ends Coparcener Rights in Joint Family Property; Unregistered Settlements Valid to Show Severance
Read More