Hurronath Roy and Others Vs Maheroollah Mollah

Calcutta High Court 8 Jan 1867 (1867) 01 CAL CK 0001

Judgement Snapshot

Judgement Text

Translate:

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J., Kemp, L.S. Jackson and Markby, JJ.@mdashWe are of opinion that the view taken by the Judge of the Small Cause Court is the correct one. The suit is brought upon the bond itself, and not upon any fresh agreement alleged to have been come to between the parties. Under these circumstances, we are of opinion that limitation did run from the time when default was made in the payment of the first installment, in consequence of which the whole amount became due. It is unnecessary for us to express any opinion as to the correctness of the decision to which reference has been made by the Judge of the Small Cause Court.

Norman, J.

I entirely agree. I had occasion to consider this question in the case of Breen v. Balfour Bourke''s Rep., 120.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Rules: Tenants Cannot Claim Ownership of Rented Property, Big Relief for Landlords
Dec
21
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Rules: Tenants Cannot Claim Ownership of Rented Property, Big Relief for Landlords
Read More
Punjab & Haryana High Court Rejects Realtor’s Plea: Signatures Only on Last Page Raise Fraud Concerns in 2007 Land Deal
Dec
21
2025

Court News

Punjab & Haryana High Court Rejects Realtor’s Plea: Signatures Only on Last Page Raise Fraud Concerns in 2007 Land Deal
Read More