Hurronath Roy and Others Vs Maheroollah Mollah

Calcutta High Court 8 Jan 1867 (1867) 01 CAL CK 0001

Judgement Snapshot

Judgement Text

Translate:

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J., Kemp, L.S. Jackson and Markby, JJ.@mdashWe are of opinion that the view taken by the Judge of the Small Cause Court is the correct one. The suit is brought upon the bond itself, and not upon any fresh agreement alleged to have been come to between the parties. Under these circumstances, we are of opinion that limitation did run from the time when default was made in the payment of the first installment, in consequence of which the whole amount became due. It is unnecessary for us to express any opinion as to the correctness of the decision to which reference has been made by the Judge of the Small Cause Court.

Norman, J.

I entirely agree. I had occasion to consider this question in the case of Breen v. Balfour Bourke''s Rep., 120.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More