Binode Behari Pati Vs Chaudhuri and Co.

Calcutta High Court 24 Feb 1919 (1919) 02 CAL CK 0037
Bench: Division Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Teunon, J; Newbould, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. This Rule is directed against an order by which the learned Subordinate Judge of Burdwan allowed the plaintiff, who was the appellant before him, to withdraw his appeal and also the original suit with liberty to bring a fresh suit in respect of the same cause of action. In his order he has not stated what in his judgment were the sufficient grounds for permitting the plaintiff to take this course. But from the petition supported by affidavit before us and not controverted by the appellant, it appears that the plaintiff''s reason for desiring to withdraw the appeal and suit was that he desired to adduce additional evidence. That is not a proper reason for permitting the plaintiff-appellant to withdraw his appeal and suit.

2. We, therefore, set aside this order and direct that the appeal be re admitted and heard and determined on the merits.

3. The plaintiff-appellant not appearing here we make no order as to costs in this Rule.

From The Blog
Punjab & Haryana High Court Jails Husband for Remarrying During Pendency of First Wife’s Divorce Appeal
Dec
06
2025

Court News

Punjab & Haryana High Court Jails Husband for Remarrying During Pendency of First Wife’s Divorce Appeal
Read More
Indian Law Firms Hire Specialists to Tackle Complex Deals, M&A, and Cyber Laws Amid Defence Booms
Dec
06
2025

Court News

Indian Law Firms Hire Specialists to Tackle Complex Deals, M&A, and Cyber Laws Amid Defence Booms
Read More