Ajit K. Sengupta, J.@mdashAt the instance of the Commissioner, West Bengal-IV, Calcutta, the following question of law for the assessment year 1976-77 has been referred to this Court u/s 256(1) of the income tax Act, 1961 (''the Act''):
Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that deduction u/s 80J of the income tax Act, 1961 should not be computed proportionately with reference to the number of days of operation during the relevant accounting year ?
The ITO disallowed the claim of the assessee for the relief u/s 80J(3) of the Act in respect of the new sumithion unit since that was in operation only for 3 days in the accounting year and that the unit showed a loss of Rs. 13,86,807 and unabsorbed development rebate of Rs. 3,26,128. The ITO restricted the amount to Rs. 4,368 proportionate to the number of days operated by the unit during the accounting year.2. On appeal by the assessee, the Commissioner (Appeals) after considering the facts of the case followed the decision of the Madras High Court in the case of
3. On those facts the question quoted before has been referred to this Court.
4. This question is now concluded by several decisions of different High Courts. Following the decision of this Court in the case of
K.M. Yusuf, J.
I agree.