In Re: Shumsher Khan <BR> The Empress

Calcutta High Court 7 Feb 1881 (1881) 02 CAL CK 0017
Bench: Division Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Prinsep, J; Cunningham, J

Acts Referred
  • Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (CrPC) - Section 36

Judgement Text

Translate:

Cunningham, J.@mdashWe think that the appeal must be dismissed, on the ground that there is no sufficient reason shown for calling in question the deliberate conclusion at which the Magistrate has arrived.

2. With regard to the point that the sentence required the confirmation of the Sessions Judge, we think that the words of Section 36 of the Code of Criminal Procedure must be construed to refer to cases in which the sentence of imprisonment is a sentence of upwards of three years, and to leave aside any sentence the Magistrate may pass as to fine or whipping.

3. We, therefore, think that it is unnecessary for the sentence in this case to be confirmed by the Sessions Judge.

4. The appeal is dismissed.

From The Blog
Case Study: How an Indian Startup Founder Incorporated in Delaware
Nov
12
2025

Court News

Case Study: How an Indian Startup Founder Incorporated in Delaware
Read More
ITAT Ahmedabad Rules in Favor of Woman: Tax Notice on ₹51 Lakh Property Purchase Quashed
Nov
12
2025

Court News

ITAT Ahmedabad Rules in Favor of Woman: Tax Notice on ₹51 Lakh Property Purchase Quashed
Read More