The Queen Vs Sham Sundar Chowdhry

Calcutta High Court 11 Dec 1868 (1868) 12 CAL CK 0019

Judgement Snapshot

Judgement Text

Translate:

Loch, J.@mdashWe concur with the Sessions Judge in thinking that the view taken by the Magistrate is erroneous. We think that if the accused have forfeited his recognizance given to the Magistrate of Tipperah by committing a breach of the peace in Sylhet of which he has been convicted and punished, the Magistrate of the former district can proceed under the provisions of Section 293 of the Criminal Procedure Code. We, therefore, set aside the order passed by the Magistrate in this case.

From The Blog
Aishwarya Rai Bachchan Wins ₹4 Crore Tax Case at ITAT Mumbai
Nov
07
2025

Court News

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan Wins ₹4 Crore Tax Case at ITAT Mumbai
Read More
Supreme Court to Decide If Section 12AA Registration Alone Grants Trusts 80G Tax Benefits for Donors
Nov
07
2025

Court News

Supreme Court to Decide If Section 12AA Registration Alone Grants Trusts 80G Tax Benefits for Donors
Read More