S.M. Dasimani Dasi Vs Srinath Ghose

Calcutta High Court 20 Jun 1869 (1869) 06 CAL CK 0044

Judgement Snapshot

Judgement Text

Translate:

Phear, J.@mdashSaid that in such cases, the Court would make a great difference between the case of an application by the plaintiff, and that of an application by the defendant. The plaintiff would not be allowed to file an additional written statement in such a case as the present; but although the filing of such an additional written statement, as that now sought to be filed by the defendant, would rightly be the subject of strong comment by the plaintiff at the hearing, still the Court would grant the application of the defendant, upon the condition that the defendant pay the costs of this application, and of filing the additional written statement, and that he furnish the plaintiff with a copy of the additional written statement, free of charge.

From The Blog
Supreme Court: Release Deed Ends Coparcener Rights in Joint Family Property; Unregistered Settlements Valid to Show Severance
Nov
09
2025

Court News

Supreme Court: Release Deed Ends Coparcener Rights in Joint Family Property; Unregistered Settlements Valid to Show Severance
Read More
Supreme Court Orders Timely Compensation for Rape Victims; POCSO and Sessions Courts Must Act Swiftly
Nov
09
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Orders Timely Compensation for Rape Victims; POCSO and Sessions Courts Must Act Swiftly
Read More