In Re: J.C. Nesbitt and F.C. Briant

Calcutta High Court 3 Mar 1870 (1870) 03 CAL CK 0023

Judgement Snapshot

Judgement Text

Translate:

Macpherson, J.@mdashIn the above cases applications were made--in the former case, by Mr. Branson, on the 2nd February, and in the latter, by Mr. Evans, on the 3rd March 1870--under section 212 of the Indian Succession Act, that letters of administration might be granted be the attorney of an absent executor. In both cases it appeared that the attorney, as well as the executor, was out of the jurisdiction of the Court. In the goods of Leeson 1 S. & T. 463 and other cases were cited in support of the application. The Court refused to grant the applications, holding that, under sections 212 and 213 of the Indian Succession Act, the Legislature intended that the attorney should be within the jurisdiction of the Court, if the executor was not within it. That by the Act there was a special procedure, and the English cases cited did not apply.

From The Blog
Quick Checklist: Start a Company in the USA from India
Nov
09
2025

Court News

Quick Checklist: Start a Company in the USA from India
Read More
Supreme Court: Release Deed Ends Coparcener Rights in Joint Family Property; Unregistered Settlements Valid to Show Severance
Nov
09
2025

Court News

Supreme Court: Release Deed Ends Coparcener Rights in Joint Family Property; Unregistered Settlements Valid to Show Severance
Read More