D.K. Jain, J.@mdashIn this writ petition the petitioner seeks quashing of a circular issued by the Deputy Commissioner on income tax to the Land
Acquisition Collector, directing him to deduct tax at source at the time of making payment of interest to the petitioner on account of enhancement
of compensation. It is also prayed that the collector may be restrained from deducting the tax at source in terms of said circular. According to the
petitioner, since the amount of interest payable on account of delay in payment of enhanced compensation is not liable to be taxed, the Land
Acquisition Collector cannot be asked to deduct tax at source.
2. The issue raised in the petition is no longer res intergra. In Bikram Singh v. Land Acquisition Collector [1997] 224 ITR 5511, the Supreme
Court has held that the interest receipt on delayed payment of the compensation, determined under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is a revenue
receipt exigible to tax u/s 4 of the income tax Act, 1961 (''the Act''). It has also been held that section 194A of the Act had no application for the
purpose of this case as it encompasses deduction of the income tax at source. However, the Court observed that the persons entitled to
compensation would be entitled to a spread over of the income for the period for which payment came to be made so as to compute the income
for assessing tax for the relevant accounting year. In view of the said authoritative pronouncement, no relief can be granted to the petitioner.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed and the Rule is discharged. The interim order stands vacated. However, the petitioner is granted liberty
to approach the concerned authority for spreading over the income to the period for which payment came to be made so that the income for the
purpose of assessing tax for the relevant assessment years could be computed. No order as to costs.