Commissioner of Income Tax Vs BIR BROS

Delhi High Court 5 Oct 2001 Surtax Reference No. 5 of 1997 5 October 2001 (2001) 10 DEL CK 0132
Bench: Full Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Surtax Reference No. 5 of 1997 5 October 2001

Hon'ble Bench

Arijit Pasayat, C.J; S.K. Agarwal, J

Advocates

R.C. Pandey and Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, for the Appellant;

Judgement Text

Translate:

Heard.

2. Following question has been referred for opinion of this court u/s 18 of the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as the Act''), read with section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Tribunal, Delhi Bench A :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the gross amount of dividends amounting to Rs. 15,272 should be deducted from the total income of the assessed, in arriving at the chargeable profits under rule 1 (viii) of the First Schedule of the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 ?"

3. We need not go into the factual aspects in detail, in view of the decision of the Apex court in COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. SUNDRAM INDUSTRIES (P) LTD., . In view of the said decision, the answer to the question referred is in the negative, in favor of the revenue and against the assessed.

4. Surtax reference is, accordingly, disposed of.

From The Blog
Supreme Court: Time-Bound Investigations Only in Cases of Undue Delay
Dec
22
2025

Court News

Supreme Court: Time-Bound Investigations Only in Cases of Undue Delay
Read More
Noida Housing Societies Face Crores in GST Notices Over Maintenance Charges
Dec
22
2025

Court News

Noida Housing Societies Face Crores in GST Notices Over Maintenance Charges
Read More