Commissioner of Income Tax Vs BIR BROS

Delhi High Court 5 Oct 2001 Surtax Reference No. 5 of 1997 5 October 2001 (2001) 10 DEL CK 0132
Bench: Full Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Surtax Reference No. 5 of 1997 5 October 2001

Hon'ble Bench

Arijit Pasayat, C.J; S.K. Agarwal, J

Advocates

R.C. Pandey and Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, for the Appellant;

Judgement Text

Translate:

Heard.

2. Following question has been referred for opinion of this court u/s 18 of the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as the Act''), read with section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Tribunal, Delhi Bench A :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the gross amount of dividends amounting to Rs. 15,272 should be deducted from the total income of the assessed, in arriving at the chargeable profits under rule 1 (viii) of the First Schedule of the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 ?"

3. We need not go into the factual aspects in detail, in view of the decision of the Apex court in COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. SUNDRAM INDUSTRIES (P) LTD., . In view of the said decision, the answer to the question referred is in the negative, in favor of the revenue and against the assessed.

4. Surtax reference is, accordingly, disposed of.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More