Meenakshi Vs Sanjay

Delhi High Court 11 Sep 2002 CM 964 of 2001 in FAO 526 of 2001 (2002) 09 DEL CK 0237
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

CM 964 of 2001 in FAO 526 of 2001

Hon'ble Bench

S.K. Mahajan, J

Advocates

Kamal Katyan, for the Appellant;

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5

Judgement Text

Translate:

S.K. Mahajan, J.@mdashThere is a delay of 37 days in filing the appeal for the condensation of which an application was filed by the appellant. It is submitted in the application that the appellant had given instructions to her counsel to file appeal against the impugned order and apply for certified copy of the same, however, it was only on 3.10.2001 that the appellant was informed by the counsel that certified copy of the impugned judgment and decree was not applied by the counsel. The appellant is stated to have engaged a new counsel thereafter who applied for certified copy and filed the appeal after certified copy was received. It is submitted that the delay in filing the appeal is due to the negligence of the counsel who was looking after the case of the appellant and was not on account of the negligence of the applicant. Despite service no one has appeared on behalf of the respondent nor reply has been filed. I have, Therefore, no reason to disbelieve the averments made in the application. I, accordingly, allow this application and condone the delay in filing the appeal. The application stands disposed of.

FAO 526/2001

2. Issue notice to the respondent both by ordinary process as well as by registered post, returnable on 09.12.2002.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Clarifies Section 27 Evidence Act: Only “Fact Discovered” Admissible, Not Entire Statement
Nov
19
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Clarifies Section 27 Evidence Act: Only “Fact Discovered” Admissible, Not Entire Statement
Read More
Bar Council of India Defends Rules Allowing Foreign Law Firms in Delhi High Court
Nov
19
2025

Court News

Bar Council of India Defends Rules Allowing Foreign Law Firms in Delhi High Court
Read More