Gangadhar Narsingdas Agrawal (Huf) Vs Commissioner of Income Tax

Bombay High Court 24 Aug 1993 IT Ref. No. 457 of 1978 (1993) 08 BOM CK 0081
Bench: Division Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

IT Ref. No. 457 of 1978

Hon'ble Bench

D.R. Dhanuka, J; B.P. Saraf, J

Advocates

Deokinandan, K.M.L. Majele, for the Appellant;

Acts Referred
  • Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 28

Judgement Text

Translate:

Dr. B.P. Saraf, J

1. By this reference under s. 256(1) of the IT Act, 1961, the Tribunal, at the instance of the assessee, has referred the following two questions of law to this Court for the opinion :

"(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the gifts of movable properties made to persons who were relations of G. N. Agrawal, but not members of the HUF were valid in law ?

(2) If the answer to question No. (1) is in the negative, whether yet the income earned by the donees from the amounts which were received by them can be included in the assessment of the assessee ?"

2. The questions pertain to the asst. yrs. 1971-72, 1972-73 and 1973-74. The controversy involved in the two questions is fully covered by the decision of this Court in the case of this very assessee Gangadhar Narsingdas Agrawal (Huf) Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, in respect of the asst. yrs. 1964-65, 1965-66 and 1966-67. Following the said decision, we answer question No. 1 in the negative, i.e., in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee. Question No. 2 is answered in the affirmative, i.e., in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.

3. No order as to costs.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Quashes Bihar PSC’s Retrospective Recruitment Rule Change, Protects Candidates’ Rights
Jan
09
2026

Court News

Supreme Court Quashes Bihar PSC’s Retrospective Recruitment Rule Change, Protects Candidates’ Rights
Read More
Madras High Court Bans Book with Scandalous Remarks Against Judge, Orders Contempt Action Against Publisher
Jan
09
2026

Court News

Madras High Court Bans Book with Scandalous Remarks Against Judge, Orders Contempt Action Against Publisher
Read More