Rajesh Kumar Vs State Of Haryana

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 2 May 2019 Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 7361 Of 2019 (O&M) (2019) 05 P&H CK 0005
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 7361 Of 2019 (O&M)

Hon'ble Bench

Mahabir Singh Sindhu, J

Advocates

Atul Lakhanpal, Neha Lakhanpal, Yashwinder Singh, Aditya Sanghi

Final Decision

Disposed Off

Acts Referred
  • Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 438, 438(2)
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 120B, 406, 420, 506

Judgement Text

Translate:

Mahabir Singh Sindhu, J

Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.674 dated 03.12.2018, under

Sections 420, 406, 506 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station City Fatehabad, District Fatehabad. This Court, on

25.02.2019, passed the following order:-

“ Contends that civil suit between the parties i.e petitioner Rajesh Kumar and complainant Raj Kumar is already pending.

Learned counsel for the complainant seeks time to have instructions in the matter.

On his request, adjourned to 27.03.2019.

In the meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation before the Investigating Officer. In the event of his arrest, the Arresting Officer

shall admit him to interim bail till the next date of hearing on his furnishing adequate bail and surety bonds to his satisfaction. The petitioner is also

directed to abide by all the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. â€​

Contends that in terms of above order, petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is no longer required.

The aforesaid factual position is duly acknowledged by learned State Counsel, on instructions from ASI Risal Singh.

Learned Counsel for the complainant expressed his anxiety only regarding the veracity of the Agreement to Sell dated 26.02.2016 (P-1).

In view of above, interim order dated 25.02.2019 is made absolute subject to the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and the present

petition stands disposed off.

It is made clear that the petitioner shall fully co-operate with the Investigating Officer as and when called for further investigation.

The observations may not be considered as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case.

However, it is made clear that this Court is not expressing any opinion on the legality and validity of the Agreement to Sell dated 26.02.2016 (P-1).

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More