Bombay High Court Sets Up High-Powered Panel to Protect Sanjay Gandhi National Park After 30 Years of Delay
Court says successive governments failed to act on orders to safeguard Mumbai’s green lung
Four-member committee to oversee boundary wall, remove encroachments, and plan rehabilitation
By Our Legal Correspondent
New Delhi: October 24, 2025: The Bombay High Court has taken a decisive step to protect one of Mumbai’s most important green spaces — the Sanjay Gandhi National Park (SGNP). After nearly three decades of unfulfilled promises and ignored court orders, the court has set up a high-powered committee to ensure that the park is preserved for future generations.
The committee will be led by Justice Dilip Babasaheb Bhosale, former Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court. Other members include former Maharashtra Chief Secretary Nitin Kareer, former Director General of Police Subodh Jaiswal, and SGNP Director Anita Patil.
This move comes after the court observed that successive governments had failed to implement its directions to safeguard the 104 sq. km. park, which is home to leopards, over 1,000 plant species, and the historic Kanheri Caves dating back to the 1st century BCE.
Why the Court Stepped In
The Division Bench of Chief Justice Shree Chandrashekhar and Justice Gautam A. Ankhad were hearing a contempt petition and a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by an NGO. The petition alleged “gross contempt” of multiple court orders issued since the late 1990s to protect SGNP.
The court noted that despite repeated judicial interventions, the state government had not taken effective steps to:
- Complete the boundary wall around the park
- Remove illegal encroachments
- Implement rehabilitation plans for displaced residents
- Prevent further destruction of the park’s ecology
The judges remarked that the failure to act had led to fresh encroachments and further degradation of the park.
The Role of the High-Powered Committee
The newly formed committee has been given wide-ranging powers and responsibilities. Its main tasks include:
- Boundary Wall Construction: Supervising the long-delayed construction of a protective wall around the park to prevent illegal entry and encroachments.
- Encroachment Removal: Identifying and removing unauthorized settlements inside the park.
- Rehabilitation Plans: Ensuring humane relocation and rehabilitation of people displaced from the park area.
- Monitoring Compliance: Making sure that all previous court orders related to SGNP are finally implemented.
- Reporting to Court: Submitting its first progress report within three months.
The court has made it clear that the committee’s work will be closely monitored, and any failure to comply will invite strict action.
Why Sanjay Gandhi National Park Matters
Sanjay Gandhi National Park is not just another green patch in Mumbai. It is one of the few national parks in the world located within city limits. Spread across Mumbai and Thane, it serves as the lungs of the city, absorbing pollution and providing fresh air to millions of residents.
Key highlights of SGNP:
- Biodiversity hotspot: Home to leopards, deer, monkeys, and over 250 species of birds.
- Cultural heritage: Houses the Kanheri Caves, a group of ancient Buddhist caves dating back over 2,000 years.
- Tourist attraction: Visited by over 2 million people annually.
- Environmental shield: Acts as a natural barrier against climate change impacts in Mumbai.
Environmentalists have long warned that unchecked encroachments, illegal construction, and government inaction could permanently damage this fragile ecosystem.
Past Failures and Delays
The issue of protecting SGNP is not new. Since the 1990s, the Bombay High Court has passed several orders directing the state government to:
- Build a boundary wall
- Relocate encroachers
- Prevent further illegal settlements
However, successive governments failed to act decisively. Political pressures, lack of funds, and administrative delays were often cited as reasons. Meanwhile, the park continued to face threats from:
- Illegal slums and encroachments
- Poaching and deforestation
- Pollution from nearby industries and traffic
The court’s latest order is seen as a last warning to the authorities to finally take action.
Public and Expert Reactions
Environmentalists and urban planners have welcomed the court’s decision. Many believe that the formation of a high-powered committee with experienced members is the only way to break the cycle of inaction.
- Environmentalists: Say this is a “historic opportunity” to save Mumbai’s green lung.
- Urban planners: Stress that protecting SGNP is crucial for the city’s long-term sustainability.
- Residents: Some fear displacement but agree that rehabilitation plans must be fair and humane.
What Happens Next
The committee has been asked to submit its first report within three months. This report will cover:
- Progress on boundary wall construction
- Steps taken to remove encroachments
- Plans for rehabilitation of displaced families
- Recommendations for long-term protection of SGNP
The High Court has also warned that if the committee fails to deliver, it will not hesitate to take stronger measures.
Conclusion
The Bombay High Court’s decision to form a high-powered committee marks a turning point in the decades-long struggle to protect Sanjay Gandhi National Park. For nearly 30 years, court orders were ignored, and the park continued to suffer. Now, with a powerful panel in place, there is renewed hope that Mumbai’s most precious green space will finally get the protection it deserves.
If implemented effectively, this move could set a precedent for the protection of other urban forests and natural reserves across India.
ALSO READ POPULAR ARTICLES
-
Supreme Court: 8-Year Service Termination Cannot Be Justified
-
NCLT Clears Reliance Retail’s ₹171 Cr Plan for Future Supply
-
Supreme Court: Hindu Succession Act Excludes Tribal Daughters
-
SC: Plaint Can’t Be Rejected If Even One Relief Is Within Time
-
SC Upholds Widow’s Inheritance Rights, Flags Order Translation Errors
-
SC Rules Waitlisted Candidates Lose Rights After Selections Join
-
SC Cracks Down on Fake Court Orders Fueling Digital Arrest Scams
-
Delhi HC Fines Centre ₹20,000 for Hiding Facts in Wankhede Case
-
Delhi HC: Landlord Needn’t Prove Exact Business for Eviction
-
SC Seeks Centre & SEBI Response on Sahara-Adani Property Sale
-
Karisma Kapoor’s Kids Challenge Sunjay Kapur’s Will Over Pronouns
-
Akshay Kumar Moves NCLAT Against Edtech Firm Over ₹4.83 Cr Dispute
-
SC Quashes Chhattisgarh Tender Clause Favoring Local Bidders
-
SC to Examine Validity of Securities Transaction Tax on Trading
-
SC Defers Vodafone Idea ₹5,606 Crore AGR Dues Hearing to Oct 13
-
Punjab & Haryana HC: Bail Can’t Be Cancelled for Seeking Hearing Exemptions
-
Delhi HC Protects Mankind Pharma’s ‘Kind’ Trademark, Bars Similar Names
-
Delhi HC Appoints Justice Rajiv Shakdher as Arbitrator in Playboy Bar Dispute
-
Karisma Kapoor’s Kids Challenge Sunjay Kapur’s Will in Delhi HC
-
SC Questions Dual Madras HC Hearings, Reserves Verdict on TVK Plea
-
SC Lets Judicial Officers With 7 Years Bar Apply for District Judge
-
SC to Hear Vijay’s TVK Plea Against SIT Probe in Karur Stampede
-
SC Probes Financial Irregularities in Indiabulls Housing: ED
-
Delhi HC Quashes 22-Year-Old Case Against Lawyer Over Basement Office
-
SC Seeks Rehab Plan for Cadets Injured During Military Training
-
SC PIL Seeks CBI Probe, Nationwide Review on Cough Syrup Deaths
-
Delhi HC Hikes Land Compensation for Yamuna Project Villagers
-
Punjab & Haryana HC: Bail Can’t Be Denied Over No Permanent Home
-
SC: Appellate Courts Can Correct Trial Court Evidence Errors