Bombay High Court Dismisses Lilavati Trust’s ₹17 Crore Suit: Charity Commissioner’s Consent Mandatory
Court Says Public Trusts Must Obtain Consent Before Filing Suits Against Trustees
Ruling Reinforces Strict Compliance with Maharashtra Public Trusts Act
By Our Legal Reporter
New Delhi: December 08, 2025:
The Bombay High Court has delivered a significant ruling in the dispute involving the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust (LKMMT), one of Mumbai’s most prominent charitable institutions. The trust had filed a suit seeking recovery of ₹17.2 crore from its former trustee, Niket Mehta, alleging unauthorized use of trust property. However, the High Court dismissed the suit, holding that it was not maintainable in law as the trust failed to obtain the mandatory consent of the Charity Commissioner under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 (MPT Act).
Also Read: Delhi High Court Restores GST Registration Cancelled Due to CA-Assessee Dispute and GSTR Default
Background of the Case
- The Trust: Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust runs the well-known Lilavati Hospital in Bandra, Mumbai.
- The Allegation: The trust accused former trustee Niket Mehta of using trust property, including a flat and office space, for personal purposes between 2007 and 2015.
- The Claim: The trust sought compensation of ₹17.2 crore for alleged unauthorized occupation.
- Legal Challenge: Mehta argued that the suit was barred under the MPT Act as the trust had not obtained prior approval from the Charity Commissioner.
Court’s Observations
Justice Milind N. Jadhav made several key observations:
- Sections 50 and 51 of MPT Act: Any suit by a public trust against a trustee or former trustee concerning trust property requires prior written consent of the Charity Commissioner.
- Mandatory Requirement: The absence of such consent makes the suit legally defective and liable to be rejected.
- Order VII Rule 11 CPC: The plaint was rejected under this provision, which allows dismissal of suits not maintainable in law.
- Trustee Status: Since Mehta was consistently described as a trustee or erstwhile trustee, the statutory requirement applied.
Also Read: ₹3.5 Lakh Penalty for Audit Trail Non-Compliance: RoC Ahmedabad Reinforces Companies Act Rules
Implications of the Ruling
- For Public Trusts: Reinforces the need for strict compliance with statutory procedures before initiating litigation.
- For Trustees: Provides protection against arbitrary suits filed without regulatory oversight.
- For Judiciary: Clarifies the scope of Sections 50 and 51 of the MPT Act, ensuring uniform application.
- For Charitable Institutions: Highlights the importance of governance and adherence to legal frameworks in managing trust property.
Wider Legal Context
- Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950: Governs the administration of public trusts in Maharashtra, requiring Charity Commissioner’s oversight in disputes involving trust property.
- Purpose of Consent: Ensures that litigation involving public trusts is scrutinized for merit and necessity, preventing misuse of judicial processes.
- Past Precedents: Courts have consistently emphasized that suits filed without Charity Commissioner’s consent are barred.
Industry and Expert Reactions
- Legal Experts: Welcomed the ruling as a reaffirmation of statutory safeguards in trust litigation.
- Trustees: Saw the judgment as a protection against harassment through frivolous suits.
- Public Trusts: Some expressed concern that the requirement may delay genuine recovery actions but acknowledged the importance of regulatory oversight.
Conclusion
The Bombay High Court’s dismissal of the Lilavati Trust’s ₹17.2 crore recovery suit underscores the mandatory requirement of Charity Commissioner’s consent under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act. The ruling strengthens governance in public trusts, ensures accountability, and prevents misuse of litigation against trustees.
This judgment will serve as a precedent for similar disputes across Maharashtra, reinforcing the principle that statutory compliance is essential before approaching courts in matters involving public trust property.
Suggested Keywords for SEO (Google + ChatGPT)
Also Read: ICAI Clears Chartered Accountant in DIR-12 Certification Case Involving Foreign National Director
- Bombay High Court Lilavati Trust case
- Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust ₹17 crore suit
- Charity Commissioner consent Maharashtra Public Trusts Act
- Bombay HC ruling public trust litigation
- Lilavati Hospital trustee dispute Bombay High Court
- Sections 50 and 51 MPT Act judgement
- Bombay High Court Justice Milind Jadhav Lilavati case
- Lilavati Trust recovery suit dismissed
Also Read: Calcutta High Court Rules Borrowers Cannot Enforce One-Time Settlement Against Banks