Delhi High Court Appoints Justice Rajiv Shakdher as Arbitrator in Playboy Bar–Grand Hotel Dispute
Arbitration to resolve commercial conflict between luxury hotel and nightclub operator
Court stresses arbitration as preferred route for speedy settlement of business disputes
By Our Legal Reporter
New Delhi: October 10, 2025:
The Delhi High Court has appointed Justice Rajiv Shakdher (Retd.), former judge of the High Court, as the sole arbitrator in a high-profile dispute between Playboy Club/Bar and Grand Hotel, Vasant Kunj. The case involves disagreements over a commercial arrangement between the luxury hotel and the operators of the Playboy-branded nightclub.
The Court’s decision highlights the judiciary’s growing emphasis on arbitration as the primary mechanism for resolving commercial disputes in India, especially in the hospitality and entertainment sectors where contracts often involve large investments and brand licensing.
Background of the Dispute
- The dispute arose out of a commercial agreement between the owners of Grand Hotel, Vasant Kunj and the operators of the Playboy Bar/Club.
- The Playboy brand, known globally for its lifestyle and entertainment ventures, had entered India through licensing arrangements with local partners.
- The Delhi outlet was one of the flagship Playboy-branded clubs in the country, located inside the Grand Hotel premises.
- Differences reportedly emerged over financial terms, operational responsibilities, and alleged breaches of contract.
When negotiations failed, the matter reached the Delhi High Court, where both parties sought judicial intervention.
Court’s Observations
Justice Sanjeev Narula, while hearing the matter, noted that:
- The agreement between the parties contained an arbitration clause, making arbitration the appropriate forum.
- Courts should encourage parties to resolve commercial disputes through arbitration rather than prolonged litigation.
- Given the complexity of the case and the need for neutrality, it was appropriate to appoint a retired senior judge as arbitrator.
Accordingly, the Court appointed Justice Rajiv Shakdher (Retd.) as the sole arbitrator to hear and decide the dispute.
Who is Justice Rajiv Shakdher?
- Justice Shakdher is a respected former judge of the Delhi High Court.
- Known for his expertise in commercial law, arbitration, and constitutional matters.
- His appointment is expected to bring credibility, neutrality, and efficiency to the arbitration process.
Why Arbitration Matters in This Case
Arbitration is increasingly seen as the preferred method of dispute resolution in commercial contracts because:
- It is faster than traditional court litigation.
- Proceedings are confidential, which is important for high-profile brands like Playboy.
- Parties can choose an expert arbitrator with relevant experience.
- Awards are binding and enforceable under Indian law.
For the hospitality industry, where disputes often involve brand reputation, licensing fees, and operational control, arbitration provides a way to resolve conflicts without prolonged public battles.
The Playboy Brand in India
- Playboy entered India through licensing deals in the mid-2010s.
- The brand launched lounges, bars, and clubs in cities like Hyderabad, Pune, and Delhi.
- The Delhi outlet at Grand Hotel was marketed as a luxury nightlife destination.
- However, several Playboy ventures in India have faced legal, financial, and operational hurdles.
This dispute with Grand Hotel is one of the most prominent legal battles involving the brand in India.
Implications for the Hospitality Industry
The case is being closely watched by the hospitality and entertainment sectors because:
- It underscores the importance of clear contracts in brand licensing and hotel partnerships.
- It shows how arbitration clauses can save time and reduce uncertainty.
- It highlights the risks global lifestyle brands face when entering the Indian market.
Industry experts say the outcome of this arbitration could influence how future hotel-nightclub partnerships are structured in India.
Next Steps in the Arbitration
- Justice Rajiv Shakdher will now set up the arbitral tribunal and issue procedural directions.
- Both parties will submit their claims, counter-claims, and evidence.
- Hearings will be conducted privately, and the arbitrator will eventually issue a binding award.
- Either party can challenge the award in court only on limited grounds under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Broader Legal Context
The Delhi High Court’s decision aligns with India’s broader push to make the country an arbitration-friendly jurisdiction.
- The Supreme Court and High Courts have repeatedly emphasized that commercial disputes should be referred to arbitration when contracts provide for it.
- India has amended its arbitration laws in recent years to make the process faster and more reliable.
- Appointing retired judges as arbitrators has become common practice to ensure neutrality and expertise.
Conclusion
The appointment of Justice Rajiv Shakdher as arbitrator in the Playboy Bar vs Grand Hotel dispute is a significant step toward resolving a high-profile commercial conflict in India’s hospitality sector.
For the parties involved, arbitration offers a chance to settle differences efficiently and confidentially. For the industry, the case serves as a reminder of the importance of robust contracts and dispute resolution mechanisms.
As arbitration proceedings begin, the outcome will not only decide the fate of the Playboy outlet at Grand Hotel but also set an example for how similar disputes in the hospitality and entertainment industries may be handled in the future.
ALSO READ POPULAR ARTICLES
-
Karisma Kapoor’s Kids Challenge Sunjay Kapur’s Will in Delhi HC
-
SC Questions Dual Madras HC Hearings, Reserves Verdict on TVK Plea
-
SC Lets Judicial Officers With 7 Years Bar Apply for District Judge
-
SC to Hear Vijay’s TVK Plea Against SIT Probe in Karur Stampede
-
SC Probes Financial Irregularities in Indiabulls Housing: ED
-
Delhi HC Quashes 22-Year-Old Case Against Lawyer Over Basement Office
-
SC Seeks Rehab Plan for Cadets Injured During Military Training
-
SC PIL Seeks CBI Probe, Nationwide Review on Cough Syrup Deaths
-
Delhi HC Hikes Land Compensation for Yamuna Project Villagers
-
Punjab & Haryana HC: Bail Can’t Be Denied Over No Permanent Home
-
SC: Appellate Courts Can Correct Trial Court Evidence Errors
-
SC Quashes Rape Case on False Marriage Promise, Terms It ‘Vengeance’
-
SC: Legal Heirs Can Claim Compensation Despite Unrelated Death
-
Allahabad HC: Wife Can Claim Maintenance from Minor Husband at 18
-
Supreme Court Directs Day-to-Day Hearings in Rape and Sensitive Cases
-
SC Upholds FIR Quashing for DM Gaming in Karnataka Poker Case
-
Delhi HC Seeks Uniform Civil Code, Flags Child Marriage Law Clash
-
SC Orders Builder to Refund ₹43 Lakh + 18% Interest for Delay
-
Delhi HC Warns Against Misuse of Section 498A in Matrimonial Cases
-
Karnataka HC Rejects X Corp’s Plea Against Govt Takedown Orders