Delhi High Court Cracks Down on Illegal Streaming: Dynamic+ Injunction Blocks Piracy Websites

5 Jan 2026 Court News 5 Jan 2026
Delhi High Court Cracks Down on Illegal Streaming: Dynamic+ Injunction Blocks Piracy Websites

“Delhi High Court Cracks Down on Illegal Streaming: Dynamic+ Injunction Blocks Piracy Websites”

 

“Court says copyrighted works must be protected as soon as they are created”

 

“Dynamic+ injunction empowers rights holders to block mirror and redirect sites”

 

By Our Legal Reporter

 

New Delhi: January 03, 2026:

In a major step against online piracy, the Delhi High Court has ordered the blocking of multiple websites illegally streaming popular shows and films such as Stranger Things, Friends, Squid Game, Batman, and The Jungle Book. The order was passed in the case Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc & Ors vs animesugez.to & Ors, with Justice Tejas Karia granting a Dynamic+ injunction to protect copyrighted works.

Also Read: India’s AGR rethink: Supreme Court and government craft a pragmatic path for telecom dues

The Court granted a “Dynamic+ injunction” to global entertainment companies including Netflix, Warner Bros., Disney, Apple, and Crunchyroll, allowing them to block not only the named websites but also future mirror or redirect sites. This ruling strengthens India’s fight against online piracy and clarifies the legal framework for protecting copyrighted works.

This ruling is significant for India’s entertainment industry, which has long struggled with piracy-related revenue losses. It also sets a precedent for how courts can respond to the “hydra-headed” nature of piracy websites, which often reappear under new domains.

Legal Issue

  • Copyright infringement: Piracy websites were illegally streaming copyrighted shows and films without authorization.
  • Dynamic+ injunction: The Court granted rights holders the ability to block not only the listed websites but also future mirror, redirect, or alphanumeric variations.
  • Immediate protection: The Court emphasized that copyrighted works must be protected as soon as they are created, to prevent irreparable loss.

Court’s Observations

  1. Hydra-headed piracy: Piracy websites often reappear under new names or domains, making enforcement difficult.
  2. Dynamic+ injunction: A proactive legal tool that allows rights holders to extend blocking orders to future infringing sites without filing new suits.
  3. Balance of rights: The Court recognized the need to protect intellectual property while ensuring internet service providers (ISPs) comply with blocking orders.
  4. Global precedent: Similar injunctions have been granted in other jurisdictions, showing India’s alignment with international anti-piracy measures.

Comparison Table: Traditional Injunction vs Dynamic+ Injunction

Also Read: Delhi High Court Allows NTA Affidavit as NEET-UG 2019 Scorecard: Relief for FMGE Aspirants

Aspect

Traditional Injunction

Dynamic+ Injunction

Impact

Scope

Blocks only listed websites

Blocks listed + future mirror/redirect sites

Stronger enforcement

Speed

Requires new suits for new sites

Immediate extension

Faster protection

Effectiveness

Limited

Comprehensive

Reduces piracy loopholes

Industry impact

Partial relief

Significant relief

Protects revenues

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Entertainment companies: Stronger protection against piracy, safeguarding billions in revenue.
  • ISPs and domain registrars: Must comply with blocking orders within 72 hours.
  • Consumers: Encouraged to use legal streaming platforms, reducing exposure to malware and scams.
  • Legal system: Sets precedent for proactive copyright enforcement in India.

Wider Context

  • Piracy in India: India is among the top countries affected by online piracy, with losses estimated in thousands of crores annually.
  • Global trend: Courts in the UK, US, and EU have adopted similar injunctions to combat piracy.
  • Digital economy: Protecting intellectual property is crucial for India’s growing OTT and film industry.

Expert Views

  • Legal experts: Call the ruling a “game-changer” in India’s fight against piracy.
  • Industry leaders: Say the injunction will boost investor confidence in India’s entertainment sector.
  • Policy analysts: Note that stronger enforcement may encourage more global platforms to expand in India.

Conclusion

The Delhi High Court’s ruling against piracy websites streaming Stranger Things and Friends marks a turning point in India’s copyright enforcement. By granting a Dynamic+ injunction, the Court has empowered rights holders to act swiftly against infringing sites, ensuring that intellectual property is protected from the moment it is created.

Also Read: India’s AGR rethink: Supreme Court and government craft a pragmatic path for telecom dues

For India’s entertainment industry, this judgment offers hope of reducing piracy-related losses and strengthening the legal framework for digital content. For consumers, it reinforces the importance of accessing content through legitimate platforms.

Suggested Keywords (SEO + ChatGPT)

  • Delhi High Court piracy websites blocking
  • Dynamic+ injunction copyright India
  • Illegal streaming Stranger Things Friends India
  • Warner Bros Netflix Disney piracy case Delhi HC
  • Copyright protection OTT platforms India
  • Delhi HC ruling illegal streaming websites
  • Intellectual property rights India piracy crackdown
  • Online piracy blocking order India

Also Read: Delhi High Court Rejects Ericsson’s Patent: Strict Standards Reinforced for Data Security Innovations

Article Details
  • Published: 5 Jan 2026
  • Updated: 5 Jan 2026
  • Category: Court News
  • Keywords: Delhi High Court piracy injunction, Dynamic+ injunction India, illegal streaming websites blocked India, online piracy Delhi High Court, copyright infringement OTT India, Warner Bros piracy case India, Netflix Disney piracy injunction
Subscribe for updates

Get curated case law updates and product releases straight to your inbox.

Join Newsletter