road safety supreme court judgment india
dr rajaseekaran road safety case summary
public interest litigation on road safety
motor vehicles act section 215 road safety council
state road safety council supreme court
Case Summary: Dr. S. Rajaseekaran v. Union of India
Citation: (2017) 11 SC CK 0091
Date of Decision: 30 November 2017
Court: Supreme Court of India
Bench: Justice Madan B. Lokur, Justice Deepak Gupta
Case No: W.P. (C) No. 295 of 2012
https://www.courtkutchehry.com/Judgement/Search/AdvancedV2?docid=2361920
Law Points Raised:
- Whether enforcement of road safety norms and accident treatment protocols requires judicial direction.
- Accountability of States and Union Territories in implementing road safety policy under Section 215 of the Motor Vehicles Act.
- Role of the judiciary in monitoring non-compliance of executive directives in a public interest framework.
- Necessity of infrastructure, data reporting, and coordination for national road safety management.
- Judicial validity of creating and empowering a Road Safety Committee under a Supreme Court directive.
Ratio Decidendi:
- Public safety is part of the right to life under Article 21 and must be protected through effective enforcement of road safety laws.
- In absence of adequate government action, the judiciary may step in via PIL to enforce life-saving policies.
- Establishing a Road Safety Committee under Supreme Court supervision was legally justified to ensure compliance and accountability.
- States have a statutory obligation to formulate Road Safety Policies and set up State Road Safety Councils under the Motor Vehicles Act.
- Lack of administrative infrastructure or delay is no justification for non-implementation of statutory duties.
Final Ruling:
The Supreme Court, recognizing the urgency of preventing road accident fatalities, directed all States/UTs to implement Road Safety Policies and operationalize State Road Safety Councils. The Court took note of government cooperation and emphasized a non-adversarial approach. The matter remains under continued monitoring to ensure compliance with the Committee’s recommendations.
Key Paragraph References:
- 1–2 – Purpose of PIL and background of petitioner
- 5–7 – Establishment and functioning of the Committee on Road Safety
- 10–13 – Data on fatalities, government apathy, and directions to Transport Secretaries
- 15–16 – Policy progress and roadmap for enforcement via chart submitted by Amicus Curiae