Ramesh Kumar Dahiya Vs Charan Singh

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 24 Feb 2001 F.A.O. No. 2231 of 1998 (2001) 02 P&H CK 0148
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

F.A.O. No. 2231 of 1998

Hon'ble Bench

V.S. Aggarwal, J; A.S. Gill, J

Advocates

Ms. Saloni Sharma, for the Appellant; Mr. N.K. Khosla, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) - Order 17 Rule 3

Judgement Text

Translate:

A.S. Gill, J.@mdashHeard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The grievance of the appellant against the order of the Tribunal in brief is that despite the fact that the appellant was bedridden, the case was closed for want of evidence and the claim petition was dismissed.

3. We have perused the record as well as the order of the Tribunal. It is a fit case where the appellant should have been granted another opportunity for producing evidence. With this observation, the appeal is allowed and the case is remanded to the tribunal to be taken up at the stage it was dismissed allowing one more opportunity to the appellant to produce his entire evidence on his own responsibility. The parties, through their counsel, are directed to appear before the Tribunal on 26.3.2001.

4. Appeal allowed.

From The Blog
Delhi ITAT Rules: Partners’ Business Expenses Are Tax-Deductible, Relief Granted to Former ICAI President Atul Gupta
Nov
26
2025

Court News

Delhi ITAT Rules: Partners’ Business Expenses Are Tax-Deductible, Relief Granted to Former ICAI President Atul Gupta
Read More
Supreme Court Clears $570M Settlement in Sandesara Brothers’ $1.6B Bank Fraud Case
Nov
26
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Clears $570M Settlement in Sandesara Brothers’ $1.6B Bank Fraud Case
Read More