Ramesh Kumar Dahiya Vs Charan Singh

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 24 Feb 2001 F.A.O. No. 2231 of 1998 (2001) 3 CivCC 485 : (2001) 3 RCR(Civil) 647
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

F.A.O. No. 2231 of 1998

Hon'ble Bench

V.S. Aggarwal, J; A.S. Gill, J

Advocates

Ms. Saloni Sharma, for the Appellant; Mr. N.K. Khosla, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 17 Rule 3

Judgement Text

Translate:

A.S. Gill, J.@mdashHeard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The grievance of the appellant against the order of the Tribunal in brief is that despite the fact that the appellant was bedridden, the case was

closed for want of evidence and the claim petition was dismissed.

3. We have perused the record as well as the order of the Tribunal. It is a fit case where the appellant should have been granted another

opportunity for producing evidence. With this observation, the appeal is allowed and the case is remanded to the tribunal to be taken up at the

stage it was dismissed allowing one more opportunity to the appellant to produce his entire evidence on his own responsibility. The parties, through

their counsel, are directed to appear before the Tribunal on 26.3.2001.

4. Appeal allowed.

From The Blog
Supreme Court to Rule on Multi-State Societies in IBC Cases
Oct
25
2025

Story

Supreme Court to Rule on Multi-State Societies in IBC Cases
Read More
Supreme Court: Minors Can Void Property Sales by Guardians
Oct
25
2025

Story

Supreme Court: Minors Can Void Property Sales by Guardians
Read More