Raghubansh Singh Vs The State of Bihar and Others

Patna High Court 10 Dec 2007 CWJC No. 2245 of 2006 (2007) 12 PAT CK 0067
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

CWJC No. 2245 of 2006

Hon'ble Bench

Navin Sinha, J

Advocates

Jitendra Pd. Singh and Apurva Pragya, for the Appellant; Lalit Kishore, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885 - Section 23(4)

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

Navin Sinha, J.@mdashIn this application the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed in rent fixation case in exercise of power u/s 23(4) of the Bihar Tenancy Act fixing commercial rate of rent for his lands on the ground that agricultural lands were being used for commercial purposes. The issue involved in this writ petition has been subject matter of consideration by a Division Bench of this Court reported in Amar Singh and Others etc. etc. Vs. The State of Bihar and Others etc. etc. and analogous cases. The conclusions noticed at paragraph 42, inter alia, are that Section 23(4) of the Bihar Tenancy Act is bad in law on account of delegation and abdication of legislative function by the legislature apart from other reasons enumerated in Clauses (i) to (iv), (vi) & (vii) of the same paragraph. The Division has circumscribed that the benefit of the aforesaid judgment shall be available to cases pending as on the date of judgment, that is, 30.5.2007.

2. The petitioner, who has clearly approached this Court prior to the aforesaid date, is entitled to the benefit of the said judgment. This writ application is allowed in the same terms and the impugned order fixing commercial rate of rent in respect of his lands are, accordingly, set aside.

From The Blog
Delhi High Court Upholds Stay on ICC Arbitration in Oman-India Border Security Dispute, Dismisses MSA Global’s Appeal
Dec
27
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Upholds Stay on ICC Arbitration in Oman-India Border Security Dispute, Dismisses MSA Global’s Appeal
Read More
Bombay High Court: Profit from Margin Glitch Not Unjust Enrichment in Kotak Securities Case
Dec
27
2025

Court News

Bombay High Court: Profit from Margin Glitch Not Unjust Enrichment in Kotak Securities Case
Read More