Ramesh Kumar Dahiya Vs Charan Singh

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 24 Feb 2001 F.A.O. No. 2231 of 1998 (2001) 02 P&H CK 0148
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

F.A.O. No. 2231 of 1998

Hon'ble Bench

V.S. Aggarwal, J; A.S. Gill, J

Advocates

Ms. Saloni Sharma, for the Appellant; Mr. N.K. Khosla, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) - Order 17 Rule 3

Judgement Text

Translate:

A.S. Gill, J.@mdashHeard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The grievance of the appellant against the order of the Tribunal in brief is that despite the fact that the appellant was bedridden, the case was closed for want of evidence and the claim petition was dismissed.

3. We have perused the record as well as the order of the Tribunal. It is a fit case where the appellant should have been granted another opportunity for producing evidence. With this observation, the appeal is allowed and the case is remanded to the tribunal to be taken up at the stage it was dismissed allowing one more opportunity to the appellant to produce his entire evidence on his own responsibility. The parties, through their counsel, are directed to appear before the Tribunal on 26.3.2001.

4. Appeal allowed.

From The Blog
High Court Rules: Married Disabled Daughter Entitled to Father’s Family Pension
Nov
26
2025

Court News

High Court Rules: Married Disabled Daughter Entitled to Father’s Family Pension
Read More
No ITR Needed for Pensioners Earning Up to ₹39,500 Monthly Under New Tax Rules
Nov
26
2025

Court News

No ITR Needed for Pensioners Earning Up to ₹39,500 Monthly Under New Tax Rules
Read More