Kanhaiya Lal Vs Domingo and Another

Allahabad High Court 28 Jun 1878 (1878) 06 AHC CK 0001
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Turner, O.C.J.; Pearson, J

Final Decision

Allowed

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. The promissory note is not made payable to any other person than the payee. It is not made payable to "order," nor to "bearer." It is therefore not a negotiable instrument." Nevertheless by the law of India a chose in action is assignable. Courts of Equity allow an assignee of a chose in action to sue in his own name, and inasmuch as our Courts are Courts of Equity as well as of Law, in our judgment an assignee of a chose in action is entitled to sue in his own name. It is, however, requisite for the Courts to bear in mind that whatever defences might be set up against the assignor may also be set up against the assignee, or at least such defences as might have been set up, up to the time when notice of the assignment was given to the defendant. The Judge of the Small Cause Court may be informed accordingly.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More