Special Reference No. 1 of 1964 (Keshav Singh’s Case)
This reference held that legislative privileges under Article 194(3) are not absolute and are subject to judicial review to protect rule of law and judicial independence.
Curated legal news, case breakdowns, and workflow tips for fast-moving practitioners.
Showing 5 of 533 articles.
This reference held that legislative privileges under Article 194(3) are not absolute and are subject to judicial review to protect rule of law and judicial independence.
This case upheld minority institutions’ rights in admissions while ensuring merit-based access, balancing religious preference with transparency and fairness in education.
This case clarified that the Union has exclusive power over industrial alcohol, limiting States to regulatory roles for public health and preventing misuse.
This case addressed judicial accountability under Article 124(5), ensuring prompt hearing while preserving inquiry integrity and procedural safeguards for Parliament.
This case upheld the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Amendment Act, affirming Parliament’s power to nationalise mines for public interest and planned development.