Supreme Court Fines Centre ₹25,000 for Giving Wrong Information
The Supreme Court fined the Centre ₹25,000 for giving incorrect information in a sensitive investigation, warning that misleading submissions can result in wrong judicial orders a…
Curated legal news, case breakdowns, and workflow tips for fast-moving practitioners.
Showing 5 of 45 articles.
The Supreme Court fined the Centre ₹25,000 for giving incorrect information in a sensitive investigation, warning that misleading submissions can result in wrong judicial orders a…
This case applied the basic structure doctrine to the Ninth Schedule, protecting pre-1973 laws while subjecting later ones to judicial review, reinforcing reforms.
This case addressed judicial accountability under Article 124(5), ensuring prompt hearing while preserving inquiry integrity and procedural safeguards for Parliament.
This case held that Article 356 cannot be used for political reasons, limiting judicial review of the President’s satisfaction and restricting States from seeking anticipatory rel…
This case upheld the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Amendment Act, affirming Parliament’s power to nationalise mines for public interest and planned development.