Supreme Court: Challenging Trial Court Orders Is Not Trial Delay
Supreme Court rules that accused persons exercising legal remedies by challenging trial court orders cannot be blamed for delaying trials, reinforcing fair trial rights.
Curated legal news, case breakdowns, and workflow tips for fast-moving practitioners.
Showing 5 of 5 articles.
Supreme Court rules that accused persons exercising legal remedies by challenging trial court orders cannot be blamed for delaying trials, reinforcing fair trial rights.
Supreme Court rules that one FIR is sufficient in mass cheating cases from a single conspiracy, allowing victim complaints as CrPC Section 161 statements.
Supreme Court rules that FIR allegations alone cannot sustain rape conviction if victim turns hostile. Court stresses victim testimony, cogent evidence, and proof beyond reasonabl…
Supreme Court acquits murder convicts after 35 years, ruling that withholding key witnesses and altering the FIR vitiated the trial. A major win for fair-trial rights in India.
The Supreme Court rules that property suits cannot be dismissed at the threshold on limitation grounds unless the bar is clear and unambiguous. The verdict strengthens property ri…