Latest Judgements

Search & filter over 1,165,643 results

Filters

Reset filters

Found 0 result

Showing 1157801- 1157810 of 0 result for ""

Updated just now

Mata Dayal Vs Queen-Empress.

Calcutta High Court

Ghose and Wilkins, JJ.@mdashWe think that this rule must be made absolute. The District Registrar has made an order directing the prosecution of the petitioner in respect of certain statements made by him before the Sub…

Citation Acts

In Re: R. Porthouse

Calcutta High Court

Sale, J.@mdashI will make the order for grant of probate, as I am satisfied on the evidence that the deceased intended by signing his name in the attestation clause to execute the will. See In the goods of Casmore (L R …

Citation

Hamidunessa Bibi and another Vs Gopal Chandra Malakar

Calcutta High Court Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 1425 of 1895

Banerjee, J.@mdashThis appeal arises out of a suit brought by the Plaintiffs, Appellants, to recover a sum of Rs. 1,004, on the allegation that the Plaintiff No. 1 gave to the Defendant a Currency Note for Rs. 1,000 for…

Kazem Sheik and others Vs Danesh Sheik

Calcutta High Court Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 1001 of 1896

Rampini, J.@mdashIn this suit the Plaintiffs sued for possession of a plot of land and to prove his title thereto. The Court of first instance gave the Plaintiffs a decree, The Lower Appellate Court has reversed the dec…

Jasimaddin Sheikh Vs Ichohak Mistri

Calcutta High Court Criminal Reference No. 90 of 1897

1. We agree with the Sessions Judge in the conclusions at which he has arrived. We accordingly set aside the conviction and sentence.

Bihari Lal Paul Vs Gopal Lal Seal and others

Calcutta High Court Civil Rule No. 182 of 1897

1. In this case a rule was issued calling upon the other side to show cause why the order of the Subordinate Judge giving rateable distribution under sec. 295 of the CPC should not be set aside. It appears that in a ren…

Pryag Singh Vs Raju Singh and Others

Calcutta High Court

Trevelyan and Stevens, JJ.@mdashThe facts necessary to narrate for the determination of this case are not many. A suit was brought for possession of a certain property, and a decree was made on the 10th August 1886 givi…

Citation

Achuta Menon Vs Achutan Nayar and Others

Madras High Court

1. Prior to the institution of the present suit, the plaintiff had instituted another, viz., Original Suit No. 189 of 1893, against these same defendantswho are contesting this suit. In that suit he sought to compel the…

Citation