Found 0 result
Showing 1158501- 1158510 of 0 result for ""
J.W. Colvile, J. 1. The only question raised by this appeal is whether the appellant, the plaintiff in the Courts below, or the respondent, was entitled to succeed to the property called talooka Gungore, the appellant…
James W. Colvile, J. 1. In the year 1815 certain persons described as the mirasi proprietors of eight shares in Rajagiri executed the deed of the 2nd of July of that year (which" is set out above). It purports on the …
Macpherson, Officiating C.J. 1. In this case I think that the conclusion at which Markby, J., has arrived is right. The tenure, with reference to which the question arises, was in existence before the Collector took ch…
James W. Colvile, J. 1. Shunmooga Pillai and Chiddunbrun Pillai were cousins, and the only members of a joint and undivided Hindu family. Shunmooga died first, and in 1858 the Appellant, claiming to be his adopted son…
Macpherson, Officiating C.J. 1. The answer to this question depends upon the construction to be put on the Dayabhaga of Jimutavahana, the founder of the Bengal school. The other authorities current in Bengal are all of…
Markby, J.@mdashThe date when the elephant was taken out of the possession of the then owner, was the 2nd Magh 1274 (22 January 1867). And whatever be the exact nature of the cause of action which is put forward in this…
Robert P. Collier, J. 1. In order to make this case intelligible, the following facts require to be stated. Odan Thakoor was one of three brothers. Shortly before his death, which occurred in February, 1827, he had ad…
Montague E. Smith, J. 1. These cross appeals arise in a suit brought by the Ranee Ryeesoonissa against the Ranee Khajooroonissa, the Defendant being the representative of the estate of Rajah Enajet Hossein. The suit w…
Macpherson, Officiating C.J. 1. We think that the decision of the Judge is wrong. S. 50 of Act XX of 1866 says that a registered document of which the registration was optional (i.e., falling under cl. 1 or 2 of s. 18)…