Found 0 result
Showing 1158571- 1158580 of 0 result for ""
Sir Richard Couch, Kt., C.J.@mdashS. 24 of Act X of 1870 says that, in determining the amount of compensation to be awarded, the Judge and Assessors must take into consideration, first, the market-value of the land at t…
Robert P. Collier, J. 1. The Madras Railway Company claimed in this suit damages against the Defendant, the Zemindar of Carvatenagarum, for injuries occasioned to their railway and works by the bursting of two tanks u…
Sir Richard Couch, Kt., C.J.@mdashMr. Lowe, who opposes the application, said that there can be very little doubt that s. 273 of Act VIII of 1859 and the following sections, as well as s. 8 of Act XXIII of 1861, are the…
Barnes Peacock, J. 1. The Appellant, the Defendant in the suit, represents the grantees of a talook under a sunnud which was made in 1775 of certain lands, the rent reserved at that time being Sanwat Azeemabadee rupee…
Phear, J.@mdashNow it seems to us plain that the parties and the Courts below have entirely misapprehended the nature of this suit. When the Mussamat assigned her decree to Rughu Nundun, he only became entitled to execu…
Barnes Peacock, J. 1. The point in this case has been reduced now to the question as to what is the proper construction to be put upon the 21st section of Act I. of 1845. The High Court expressed their opinion " that …