Latest Judgements

Search & filter over 1,159,844 results

Filters

Reset filters

Found 0 result

Showing 1158691- 1158700 of 0 result for ""

Updated just now

The Queen Vs Tarucknath Mookerjee

Calcutta High Court Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 17 of 1873

Phear, J.@mdashIt appears that in this case, Tarucknath Mookerjee was, in consequence of some knowledge or information, obtained by the Magistrate, brought before the Magistrate under a warrant to answer a charge therei…

Bistoo Chunder Banerjee Vs Nithore Monee Dabee and Another

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 615 of 1872

Glover, J.@mdashThe plaintiff in this suit was the purchaser of a right of action in a contribution suit against certain parties. He brought the suit and was successful in getting a decree against the defendants for cer…

The Queen Vs Soobjan

Calcutta High Court Criminal Case No. 977 of 1872

Phear, J.@mdashIn this case the prisoner has been convicted of murder by the Sessions Judge differing from the assessors, and the prisoner has been sentenced to death. The assessors are of opinion that the evidence is n…

Tarrucknath Sirkar Vs Prosunno Koomar Ghose

Calcutta High Court

Sir Richard Couch, Kt. C.J. 1. The suit is brought by Tarrucknath Sirkar who claims the whole of the property, and he asked that it might be declared that, under and by virtue of the will of Hurronundo Sirkar, Luckymon…

Wise Vs Rajnarain Chuckerbutty

Calcutta High Court Miscellaneous Special Appeal No. 148 of 1872

Sir Richard Couch, Kt. C.J. 1. The suit appears to have been brought to recover arrears of rent for 28 years, and, it appears that one, of the defendants Gourisunker had boon in possession up to a pertain time, and tha…

Bonomally Nawn Vs T. Campbell

Calcutta High Court

Sir Richard Couch, Kt., C.J.@mdashIt is stated in the case which has been sent to us that the suit, which on the face of it purports to be a suit for the recovery of a sum over Rs. 500, was originally tried by the First…

Mussumat Jumeela and Others Vs Mussumat Mulleeka

Privy Council

Barnes Peacock, J. 1. The Appellant was one of the Defendants in the Court below. The suit was brought to recover a very large sum of money--viz., Rs. 16.25,000, upwards of ?160,000, as the balance due on account of d…

Citation

F.F. Wyman Vs A. Banks

Calcutta High Court

Sir Richard Couch, Kt., C.J.@mdashThis is an appeal from the decision of Macpherson, J., rejecting a plaint in an action brought by the plaintiff F.F. Wyman for a libel which he alleged had been published concerning him…