Latest Judgements

Search & filter over 1,159,844 results

Filters

Reset filters

Found 0 result

Showing 1158881- 1158890 of 0 result for ""

Updated just now

Taki Mahomed Mandal Vs Krishna Nath Rai and Others

Calcutta High Court Reference to the High Court, under section 434 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, by the Officiating Sessions Judge of Jessore, in his letter No. 43, dated the 10th March 1871

Jackson, J.@mdashWe agree with the Magistrate and the Sessions Judge. We quash the order of the Deputy Magistrate, dismissing the complaint for default, and direct that he proceed therewith according to law.

Mahomed Aizaddi Shaha Vs Shaffi Mulla and Another

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 2279 of 1870

Paul, J.@mdashIn this case it appears to us that the decision of the Subordinate Judge in an appeal from the decision of the Moonsiff amounts to a mistrial. The first Court found the document on which the plaintiff rest…

Thakur Sing Vs Fakir Chand

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 2218 of 1870

Macpherson, J.@mdashThe only ground of special appeal which it is necessary for me to notice, because I think that it is the only one in which there is any substance, is the first, namely, that the plaint merely asks fo…

In Re: Srimati Nassir Jan and Another

Calcutta High Court Rule Nisi or Motion No. 908 of 1871

Jackson, J.@mdashThe applicant in this case obtained a rule calling upon the other side to show cause why the decision of the Collector of Tipperah, dated 18th May 1870, in the case of Jamiruddin Bhuia v. Hanif Bhuia, s…

Ram Chandra Tantra Das Vs Dharmo Narayan Chuckerbutty

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 407 of 1870

Norman, J.@mdashWe are all of opinion that the interest of an heir, according to Hindu law, expectant on the death of a widow in possession, is not property. It is a mere expectancy, and therefore not rendered liable to…

Bamandas Mukhapadhya Vs Shibdas Bandapadhya

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 1820 of 1870

Norman, Offg. C.J. 1. The appellants first attempted to argue that the tenure in question consisted of land in a town; that, under Act X of 1859, the Collector had no jurisdiction to entertain a suit for the rent of su…

Somarimull Vs Bhairo Das Johury

Calcutta High Court

Paul, J.@mdashThe plaintiff sues as endorsee his immediate endorser, the defendant, on a bill for Rs. 2,500 drawn by Narayan Sing and Co., and accepted by Charles Nephew and Co. There was an endorsement from Narayan Sin…

Ishan Chandra and Others Vs Sujan Bibi

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 2211 of 1870

Mookerjee, J.@mdashThe only point submitted for consideration in this special appeal is, whether the Judge was right in rejecting the document, on which the suit was based, for want of registration. The Judge considers …