Latest Judgements

Search & filter over 1,159,844 results

Filters

Reset filters

Found 0 result

Showing 1158951- 1158960 of 0 result for ""

Updated just now

Harrihar Mandar and Another Vs Mullick Kurim Baksh

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 2806 of 1869

Sir Richard Couch, Kt., C.J.@mdashThe Court has found in this case that there had been an enjoyment for a long time, and, consequently, that the plaintiff had established his right to the use of the water. Now I think w…

Asrafannissa Begum Vs Syad Inaet Hossein

Calcutta High Court Rule Nisi No. 334 of 1870

Bayley, J.@mdashI am of opinion that this rule ought to be discharged with costs. The ground of this application which is made, u/s 15 of the Charter Act, is that, whereas the lower Court admitted the review after a per…

In Re: Ship "Portugal"

Calcutta High Court

Phear, J.@mdashI think Mr. Phillip''s client is entitled to the injunction for which he asks, and that the rule nisi should be made absolute. Hossein Ibrahim chartered the Ship Portugal in December 1868, for a voyage to…

Mahes Chandra Chattapadhya Vs Guruprasad Roy

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 111 of 1870

L.S. Jackson, J.@mdashThe question raised in this special appeal is, whether, in execution of a decree for arrears of rent, under Act X of 1859, the Collector has power to sell the right of the judgment-debtor to recove…

Chattar Dhari Sing Vs Mussamat Jai Bansi Kunwar

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 2426

Bayley, J.@mdashIn these cases one Harprasad is admittedly the original owner of the property. The plaintiff, Chattar Dhari Sing, is the brother of the husband of Deojani, a sister of the said Harprasad, and sues as her…

The Queen Vs Chandra Sekhar Roy

Calcutta High Court

L.S. Jackson, J.@mdashIt appears to me that the opinion expressed by the Magistrate in making this reference is correct, and that the Assistant Magistrate against whose Court an offence punishable u/s 174 of the Indian …

Rani Risannissa Begum Vs Mussamat Rani Khijarannissa

Calcutta High Court Regular Appeal No. 243 of 1869

Loch, J.@mdashThe points raised in appeal are, first, that the claim in regard to that portion of the dower which is prompt is barred by the Law of Limitation; second, that the claim in regard to the portion of the dowe…

Ram Golam Sahi and Others Vs Har Gopal Das and Another

Calcutta High Court Regular Appeal No. 271 of 1869

Bayley, J.@mdashBaboo Har Gopal Das and Hansraj Sahu are (defendants) appellants, versus Ram Gopal Sahi and others, (plaintiffs), and the Collector (a defendant), respondents. The plaintiff sued for declaration of right…