Latest Judgements

Search & filter over 1,159,844 results

Filters

Reset filters

Found 0 result

Showing 1158991- 1159000 of 0 result for ""

Updated just now

Khettra Mohan Baboo Vs Rashbehari Baboo

Calcutta High Court Rule Nisi No. 177 of 1870

Bayley, J.@mdashThe petitioner, Khettra Mohan Baboo, applied, on the 21st December 1869, praying that the order of the Subordinate Judge of Burdwan, dated the 2nd October last should be annulled and made consonant with …

In Re: J.C. Nesbitt and F.C. Briant

Calcutta High Court

Macpherson, J.@mdashIn the above cases applications were made--in the former case, by Mr. Branson, on the 2nd February, and in the latter, by Mr. Evans, on the 3rd March 1870--under section 212 of the Indian Succession …

Madhusudan Mazumdar Vs Gayaram Mazumdar

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 2138 of 1869

Kemp, J.@mdashThe decision of the Subordinate Judge of West Burdwan appears to us to be clearly wrong. The special respondent, the plaintiff below, is a mortgagee. The sum for which the property was mortgaged being less…

Mussamat Banu Vs Narayan Sahu

Calcutta High Court Miscellaneous Special Appeal No. 80 of 1870

Norman, Officiating C.J. 1. The facts of this case are that the plaintiff and the defendant, by a private agreement in March 1867, agreed to refer a claim by the plaintiff to rupees 104, exclusive of interest, for mone…

Cowar Rajkumar Roy Vs S.M. Kadambini Debi

Calcutta High Court

Norman, J.@mdashThis case has been referred to a Full Bench of this Court in consequence of the decision in Misree Begum v. Punnoo Singh 8 W.R. 362, which is at variance with an earlier decision in Monohur Khan v. Troyl…

Radha Prasad Singh Vs Megh Narayan Sing and Others

Calcutta High Court Miscellaneous Regular Appeal No. 363 of 1869

C.P. Hobhouse, J.@mdashWe think that this appeal must; be dismissed with costs. The decree-holder in this case was one Maheswar Bax Sing. The decree was for possession of certain immoveable properties. On the 22nd Janua…

Tulsi Ram Sahu Vs Harrak Sing and Another

Calcutta High Court Appeal No. 1 of 1870

Norman, Officiating C.J. 1. The question before us is whether the Deputy Collector was wrong in not fixing an issue upon the question whether the tenure held by the defendants is protected from enhancement by the provi…