Found 0 result
Showing 1159051- 1159060 of 0 result for ""
Loch, J.@mdashThe first ground taken in special appeal in this case is that the Collector had no jurisdiction to try this case under Act X of 1859, as the land was not used for agricultural or horticultural purposes. Th…
Kemp, J.@mdashThe defendant is the special appellant in this case. It appears that the plaintiff hired a thatched bungalow from the defendant at a monthly rent of 30 rupees. We are not told whether there was any lease e…
Loch, J.@mdashThe first ground taken in special appeal in this case is that the Collector had no jurisdiction to try this case under Act X of 1859, as the land was not used for agricultural or horticultural purposes. Th…
Hobhouse, J.@mdashIn this case the plaintiff sued to obtain possession of a certain howla tenure, alleged to be situated in the talook of the zamindars, defendants, on the ground that they had been dispossessed of the s…
Kemp, J.@mdashThis was a suit for the rent of 1275. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant took a lease of the properties for which the rent is claimed from the year 1274 to the year 1283, at a jumma of rupees 249, on…
Loch, J.@mdashI think this case must go back to the first Court. It appears that when the case WAS first tried, the defendants, the respondents before us, were not present, and the case was decided ex parte. The respond…
Hobhouse, J.@mdashThis was a suit for a declaration of right of way over certain lands, the property of the defendants; the plaintiffs claiming to have that right by a particular line. The first Court held that the plai…
Bayley, J.@mdashThe plaintiff in this case sued for possession of two plots of land as belonging to his patni Mehal, which he says he acquired from one Aka Golam Ali. The plaintiff''s allegation was that his cause of ac…
E. Jackson, J.@mdashThis was a suit for a kabuliat at an enhanced rate of rent. The kabuliat was allowed at an enhanced rate by both the Courts below, and a term of three years was fixed during which the kabuliat was to…
Phear, J.@mdashI think the Commissioner has no powers, excepting those conferred by the Act. The application must, therefore, be refused.