Latest Judgements

Search & filter over 1,159,701 results

Filters

Reset filters

Found 0 result

Showing 1159391- 1159400 of 0 result for ""

Updated just now

Mussamut Jumayi Vs Sheikh Wahid Ali

Calcutta High Court Regular Appeal No. 256 of 1868

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashThere are some facts in this case which are beyond dispute. One is that the plaintiff in this suit was, on the 30th of December 1854, when the litigation was commenced by Wahid Ali aga…

Cook and Others Vs Jadab Chandra Nandi

Calcutta High Court

Norman, J.@mdashIt appears that in a suit on the same written contract, instituted on the 12th of March in this year, for breaches of it, which had then been committed, the defendant put in an answer in these terms: "De…

In Re: Haran Mandal

Calcutta High Court

Glover, J.@mdashThis case is not without difficulty; but after the best consideration I have been able to give to it, it appears to me that the conviction ought to be allowed to stand. I have considerable doubt, in the …

Raja Nilmani Sing Vs Annadaprasad Mookerjee

Calcutta High Court Regular Appeals Nos. 148 and 149

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashThe lease mentioned the amounts of rent to be paid, but it provided that the tenant should, within a certain period, ascertain what were the real assets of the property; that if they w…

J.G. Bagram Vs J.P. Wise

Calcutta High Court Miscellanenous Appeal No. 24 of 1868

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashIt is quite clear that the Court to which the decree was sent had jurisdiction over its own order striking off the case, whatever the striking off amounts to. As soon as a copy of the …

Raghunandan Thakur Vs Ram Charankapali

Calcutta High Court

Macpherson, J.@mdashI think that the Lower Appellate Court is right; for I concur with the Judge in the opinion that a gomastah cannot institute a suit in the name of the landholder by whom he is employed, unless he is …

Raja Nilmani Sing Vs Annadaprasad Mookerjee

Calcutta High Court Regular Appeal No. 364 of 1867

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashWe have no doubt that this suit was maintainable. There was a covenant, on a given event, to make an abatement in the rent nominally fixed, and to refund a rateable proportion of the c…

The Queen Vs Hari Giri

Calcutta High Court

Glover, J.@mdashWe see no reason whatever to interfere in the prisoner''s favour, and his appeal is rejected. Indeed, we are very decidedly of opinion that, on the evidence, the prisoner should have been convicted of mu…